|
|
Post by robincrazy on May 15, 2006 16:51:19 GMT -5
I agree that modern technology, photo editing software and so, help to give your caricatures nice finishing touches. But I dont agree that distorting a picture and making it look like a painting can be called art at all, there is no talent there, no real creativity. I mean, even a kid can do something like this:  There's no talent in such, is there? RC |
|
|
|
Post by horate on May 15, 2006 18:49:38 GMT -5
cof cof cof...i think Vidal, can give u a good answer amigo, .....hihihi...
|
|
|
|
Post by horate on May 15, 2006 18:50:07 GMT -5
i mean answer...oppppsss !!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by nelsonsantos on May 16, 2006 4:46:54 GMT -5
I agree that modern technology, photo editing software and so, help to give your caricatures nice finishing touches. But I dont agree that distorting a picture and making it look like a painting can be called art at all, there is no talent there, no real creativity. I mean, even a kid can do something like this: There's no talent in such, is there? RC Yeah, go tell that to Joe Bluhm, Court Jones, Jason Seiler, Opdebeeck and many others ... |
|
|
|
Post by robincrazy on May 16, 2006 12:43:48 GMT -5
Well, as a profesional caricaturist, it's a tool, as I just mentioned. But distorting a photograph, edit it, and then present it as "my creation", seems like "cheating", thas only my oppinion, I'm no one to judge the ones who do it. I just feel that it's more admirable to do a caricature "the old way", by hand.
RC
|
|
