Post by robincrazy on May 12, 2006 20:55:25 GMT -5
The worst comparison reference I have found is such called average face. My worst caricatures have been drawn thinking of that so called average useless face...
For example, I have this client whose nose is a lot biger than average, BUT in his own face, his nose seems to be of regular size, so as I compared with average..... LIKENES IS LOST!
Then this other client whose separation between eyes is bigger than average, but it happens that according to her own features, eyes seem to be very close toghether.... but teacher says, compare vs. average, so once again... LIKENESS IS LOST!
So I don't believe in that b**ch with such average face, very bad reference, ...
Who is my reference face then?
THE VICTIM ITSELF!, much more trustable and better results if I compare victim's facial features against eachother.
How does a banana taste compared to a pizza? no way.
Sorry, but I disagree with such advice. It just doesn't seem to get the job done right.
RC
For example, I have this client whose nose is a lot biger than average, BUT in his own face, his nose seems to be of regular size, so as I compared with average..... LIKENES IS LOST!
Then this other client whose separation between eyes is bigger than average, but it happens that according to her own features, eyes seem to be very close toghether.... but teacher says, compare vs. average, so once again... LIKENESS IS LOST!
So I don't believe in that b**ch with such average face, very bad reference, ...
Who is my reference face then?
THE VICTIM ITSELF!, much more trustable and better results if I compare victim's facial features against eachother.How does a banana taste compared to a pizza?
no way.Sorry, but I disagree with such advice. It just doesn't seem to get the job done right.
RC
